IJMSMT · Original Research Article Vol. 1, No. 1 (October 2026), pp. 143–158
Maritime Transport and Shipping

EMERGING TRENDS IN MARITIME TRANSPORT DEVELOPMENT AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR NIGERIA’S MARITIME SECTOR

Maximus Chidozie Okoro* — Federal University of Technology, Owerri, Imo State, Nigeria
* Corresponding author: mdozyokoro@gmail.com
Published: 1 November 2026 •Received: 20 Aug 2026 •Accepted: 21 Sep 2026 •DOI: mdozyokoro@gmail.com • Licence: CC BY 4.0

Abstract

Maritime transport remains central to international trade, carrying the vast majority of global merchandise flows and functioning as a key driver of economic integration and development. In recent decades, the sector has undergone profound transformation driven by technological innovation, tightening environmental regulations, evolving trade patterns, and growing sustainability imperatives. These forces are reshaping the planning, operation, and governance of maritime transport systems worldwide. For maritime-dependent developing economies such as Nigeria, the ability to anticipate and respond to these changes is increasingly critical to competitiveness, resilience, and sustainable growth. This paper examines future trends in maritime transport development through a systematic and critical review of peer-reviewed literature and authoritative secondary sources. It focuses on interrelated global developments, including digitalization and smart shipping, decarbonization and green maritime practices, port automation, and the advancement of integrated maritime logistics. By synthesizing insights across these strands of scholarship, the study identifies dominant trajectories shaping the sector and considers their broader implications for maritime transport systems. These trends are then contextualized within Nigeria’s maritime environment, with particular attention to structural, institutional, and policy dimensions. The paper’s contribution lies in its integrative and comparative analysis, which links global maritime transformations to Nigeria’s specific developmental conditions. Aligned with key International Maritime Organization frameworks and relevant Sustainable Development Goals, the findings indicate that while emerging trends present significant opportunities for Nigeria, their realization will depend on coherent policy alignment, strengthened institutional capacity, and sustained investment in maritime technology and infrastructure.

Keywords: Maritime Transport; Future Trends; Digitalization; Sustainable Development
Full text

The complete article is available as a PDF, free to read and download under CC BY 4.0.

Download PDF

References

  1. Adeniran, A. O., & Yusuf, M. A. (2019). Maritime transport and port efficiency in Nigeria: Challenges
  2. and policy options. Journal of Transport and Supply Chain Management, 13, 1–10.
  3. Aderibigbe, O. A., Akinwale, Y. O., & Olomu, M. O. (2020). Port governance, institutional efficiency
  4. and cargo dwell time in Nigerian seaports. Maritime Policy & Management, 47(6), 792–808. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2019.1705413
  5. Balcombe, P., Brierley, J., Lewis, C., Skatvedt, L., Speirs, J., Hawkes, A., & Staffell, I. (2019). How to
  6. decarbonise international shipping: Options for fuels, technologies and policies. Energy Conversion and Management, 182, 72–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.12.080
  7. Bouman, E. A., Lindstad, E., Rialland, A. I., & Strømman, A. H. (2017). State-of-the-art technologies,
  8. measures, and potential for reducing GHG emissions from shipping: A review. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 52, 408–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.022
  9. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in
  10. Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  11. Geels, F. W. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven
  12. criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002
  13. Heilig, L., Schwarze, S., & Voß, S. (2017). An analysis of digital transformation in the history and
  14. future of modern ports. In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1341–1350).
  15. International Maritime Organization. (2018). Initial IMO strategy on reduction of GHG emissions from
  16. ships. London, England: Author.
  17. Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2020). Viability of intertwined supply networks: Extending the supply chain
  18. resilience angles towards survivability. International Journal of Production Research, 58(10), 2904–2915. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1592761
  19. Lambrou, M. A., Watanabe, D., & Iida, J. (2019). Shipping digitalization management:
  20. Conceptualization, typology and antecedents. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 4(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-019-0052-2
  21. Molavi, A., Lim, G. J., & Shi, J. (2020). Stakeholder analysis of smart ports: A systematic literature
  22. review. Maritime Policy & Management, 47(8), 1023–1042. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2020.1736353
  23. Notteboom, T., & Rodrigue, J.-P. (2005). Port regionalization: Towards a new phase in port
  24. development. Maritime Policy & Management, 32(3), 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088830500139885
  25. Notteboom, T., Pallis, A., & Rodrigue, J.-P. (2020). Port economics, management and policy:
  26. Digitalization, automation and sustainability. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 34, 100376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2019.100376
  27. Notteboom, T., Rodrigue, J.-P., & Pallis, A. (2021). The future of port governance: Towards a dynamic
  28. model. Maritime Policy & Management, 48(2), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2020.1737331
  29. Panayides, P. M., & Song, D.-W. (2013). Maritime logistics as an emerging discipline. Maritime Policy
  30. & Management, 40(3), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2013.782307
  31. Psaraftis, H. N., & Kontovas, C. A. (2020). Decarbonization of maritime transport: Is there light at the
  32. end of the tunnel? Sustainability, 12(1), 348. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010348
  33. Psaraftis, H. N., Lagouvardou, S., & Papapostolou, N. (2021). Maritime supply chain resilience: A
  34. conceptual framework. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 23(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41278-020-00172-8
  35. Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (1994). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In A. Bryman &
  36. R. G. Burgess (Eds.), Analyzing qualitative data (pp. 173–194). London, England: Routledge.
  37. Rodrigue, J.-P., & Notteboom, T. (2013). The geography of ports and terminals. In J.-P. Rodrigue
  38. (Ed.), The geography of transport systems (3rd ed., pp. 171–192). New York, NY: Routledge.
  39. Sanchez-Gonzalez, P.-L., Díaz-Gutiérrez, D., Leo, T. J., & Núñez-Rivas, L. R. (2019). Toward
  40. digitalization of maritime transport? Sensors, 19(4), 926. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19040926
  41. Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal
  42. of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
  43. Stopford, M. (2009). Maritime economics (3rd ed.). London, England: Routledge.
  44. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence
  45. informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375
  46. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2021). Review of maritime transport 2021.
  47. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
  48. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2022). Review of maritime transport 2022.
  49. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
  50. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2023). Review of maritime transport 2023. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
  51. World Bank. (2021). Connecting to compete 2021: Trade logistics in the global economy. Washington,
  52. DC: Author.